Original Nakedness: Receiving One Another as Gifts

Last month, I introduced Pope St. John Paul II’s concept of original nakedness.  In that reflection, we saw that our first parents “were both naked, and were not ashamed” (Gen 2:25).  According to the saintly pope, this lack of shame corresponded to a fullness of interior freedom they felt in one another’s presence.  By virtue of original innocence, by which the man and woman were untainted by sin and filled with God’s grace, they were able to behold each other “with all the peace of the interior gaze” (TOB 13.1).  The pope was referring here to a capacity to “see” each other not only with physical eyes but also – to borrow an expression from St. Paul — with the eyes of the heart (cf. Eph 1:18).  What precisely is this “interior gaze” or “heart vision” through which our first parents beheld each other?  And what does it have to do with us?

Physical eyes see the exterior of things:  light and dark, shape, colors, texture, movement, etc.  When we look at one another only with this limited form of vision, we merely see the exterior of the body. We fail to see the interior reality of the person.  This can lead us to treat the person as just one more object among so many in our environment.  Like any other object we see, we begin to evaluate this object as to what it can do for me.  How useful is it?  Will it gratify me in some way or give me pleasant feelings?  Is it what I want? 

If we are to avoid this objectification of the person, our exterior vision needs to be guided and informed by a heart that “sees” the true value of things and is disposed to receive them with gratitude.  Indeed, all of creation is a gift to man from our loving Creator and is meant to draw us back to Him.  Everything that exists has a certain truth, goodness, and beauty in it that reflects the infinite Truth, Goodness, and Beauty that exist eternally in God.  There is nothing in visible creation for which this is more true than the human person.  Made in the image and likeness of God, possessing the capacity of self-awareness and self-determination, the human person is the most exalted creature in all of the visible world.  A person is not just a “what” but a “who,” another “I” like me.  Each person is entirely unique, a son or daughter of God set in a distinct, unrepeatable relationship with Him.  A person is capable, through freedom and intelligence, of truly human activity.  We discover all of this through the human body, if we have the interior eyes to see it, for the body reveals the hidden, spiritual reality we call person.  The body makes the person present and is the “place” of encounter with the person. 

Our first parents instinctively saw the fullness of the dignity of the person revealed in each other’s bodies.  Indeed, they saw all of creation as a gift given by their loving Father to be cherished and respected, most of all one another.  They beheld each other as embodied personal subjects and not as mere objects to be used.  They intuitively knew that this body reveals a person, and a person is the sort of thing that must never be used and must always respected with awe and reverence.  I can never “possess” another person or treat him/her as a means to an end.  This attitude filled their hearts and enlightened their eyes.  This is why they could be “naked” and not feel “ashamed.”  There was no danger or threat for them in being completely exposed (physically and spiritually) before each other.  They were totally safe in each other’s person-affirming gaze.

For us, wounded as we are by sin yet redeemed by Christ, we have to work hard, with the help of God’s grace, to grow into this capacity to always “see” and affirm the person.  Even then it is not fully attained in this fallen world in which threats to our dignity abound and the effects of sin are never totally blotted out.  Nonetheless, pondering original nakedness underscores for us the dignity of the person and points out to us the incredible respect that every human person, revealed by his or her body, deserves.  It is only in letting this vision take root in our hearts that we can hope to experience a glimmer of the intimacy with God and others for which we are created.

Note:  This article is part of a series of reflections on Pope St. John Paul II’s “Theology of the Body”.

Continue Reading: Gift, Self-gift, and the Meaning of Life — Part 1

Dr. Sodergren’s Introduction to Theology of the Body: A Collection of Articles from the Catholic Telegraph

Written by, Dr. Andrew Sodergren, M.T.S., Psy.D.,
Director of Ruah Woods Psychological Services

(Article originally published in The Catholic Telegraph, April 2022 Issue, the official magazine of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati)

Gift, Self-gift, and the Meaning of Life — Part 1

For several months, I have been reflecting in these articles on the “original experiences” explored by Pope St. John Paul II in his Theology of the Body.  Before moving on to other aspects of TOB, I want to ponder the crucial theme of gift, which is like a golden thread woven throughout the late pope’s work. 

Like our first parents, we all come into the world by a power other than our own.  None of us creates ourselves or bestows the gift of life on ourselves.  Rather, we all come from Another.  Our life, our being comes to us as an unmerited gift from God our Creator mediated through our parents.  This points to a fundamental truth:  all of creation depends on God for existence.  Indeed, an important principle in Catholic theology that informed Pope St. John Paul II’s thought is that God is the only being that necessarily exists.  He possesses His own existence and does not depend on anything or anyone in order to be.  Rather, God exists for all eternity in a state of fullness and perfection.  Even more, this state of fullness and perfection consists of an exchange of love without beginning or end among the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit that is so real and perfect that we can affirm with St. John the Apostle that God is love (cf. 1 Jn 4:8b).  God Himself is a Divine Communion of Persons in which there is an eternal giving and receiving of Love.

When God creates, He does not do so out of any necessity but does so freely out of the superabundance of His love.  Everything that He creates depends on Him for the gift of existence.  This is true not only at the beginning of life but also at every moment thereafter.  Indeed, all of creation only exists moment-by-moment because God continually wills it into existence.  It is through His loving gift, that you and I exist right now.  As my college chaplain once told me, “If God ever ceased loving you, you would cease to exist.” 

This connection between love and existence is incredibly profound.  It means that all things that exist — rocks, plants, animals, humans, angels — only exist because God loves them into being at every moment.  One implication of this is that there is NEVER a moment in which God is not thinking about you specifically and loving you into existence.  Every beat of your heart, every breath of your lungs, every second that goes by is a gift of love given to you by our God who is Love.  Indeed the very ground of our being is the infinite love of God.  Our first and most fundamental calling, then, is simply to receive God’s gift of life with gratitude, awe, and wonder.

Furthermore, we saw in our reflections on original solitude that all of the visible creation is further given as a gift of love to humanity.  All creatures are meant to reveal — in the measure they are capable — something of the glory and majesty of God.  God gave us the entire cosmos to remind us of Himself and for us to cultivate and make a home worthy of humanity, His most beloved creation in the visible world. 

In our reflections on original unity, we saw that it was not enough for our loving Father to give us the world, but He also gave us to each other by introducing the sexual difference into our humanity.  Through our maleness and femaleness, which are revealed in the body and affect the whole person to his or her very core, we are called and capacitated to form a communion of persons through spousal love.  Through the total gift of self in marriage, the love of man and woman can be personified in the gift of their child, thus forming an icon of the Blessed Trinity.

In all of this, we see that the logic of gift defines the very structure of reality.  In God, there is an eternal giving and receiving among the Divine Persons.  The act of creation itself is also a sheer act of generosity in which creatures are given the gift of existence at every moment by God.  Man most of all is the recipient of God’s greatest gifts — life, the cosmos, each other, and, ultimately, Himself.  This logic of gift is thus fundamental for our understanding of God, the world, and ourselves.  We will ponder this theme further next time and unpack its importance for our vocation.

Note:  This article is part of a series of reflections on Pope St. John Paul II’s “Theology of the Body”.

Continue Reading: Gift, Self-gift, and the Meaning of Life — Part 2

Dr. Sodergren’s Introduction to Theology of the Body: A Collection of Articles from the Catholic Telegraph

Written by, Dr. Andrew Sodergren, M.T.S., Psy.D.,
Director of Ruah Woods Psychological Services

(Article originally published in The Catholic Telegraph, May 2022 Issue, the official magazine of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati)

Gift, Self-gift, and the Meaning of Life — Part 2

Last month, I reflected on the logic of gift and how it is a golden thread woven throughout Pope St. John Paul II’s thought, especially his Theology of the Body.  We saw how all of creation, including man, depends on God’s loving gift of existence at every moment.  We also saw how the logic of gift even describes the inner life of God Himself who is an eternal exchange of love between Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.  Let us extend those reflections to explore what the logic of gift has to say about our vocation and the role of the human body in revealing these mysteries. 

To say that the very being of man is a gift to him from the Creator means that the logic of gift marks “the very essence of the person” (TOB 14:2).  If gift characterizes the very being and essence of man, then his ultimate fulfillment must be found through freely making a gift of himself to others.  According to Pope St. John Paul II, man cannot find fulfillment in isolation.  Rather, he can find fulfillment “only by existing ‘with someone’ — and, put even more deeply and completely, by existing ‘for someone’” (TOB 14:2, italics in original). 

This “existing for” another is what “self-gift” means.  We make a gift of self whenever we engage in some act of self-sacrifice for others.  Each of these acts of generosity in which we seek the good of the other before ourselves are acts of self-giving that contribute to the fulfillment of our being.  However, the fullest expression of self-gift is when we make a “total” gift of self.  Such “total” giving is properly called a “spousal” gift of self, whereby we enter a permanent, exclusive relationship of belonging entirely to another.  Marriage is the primordial “place” given to us by God for such a spousal gift of self.   

The human body bears witness to all of this.  Our bodies show us that our life is a gift since we come from another and depend on others to exist.  We are conceived and gestated in our mother’s womb, born of her body, and physically nurtured by her and others as we grow.  Indeed, human beings are remarkable in the visible world in that the human body takes an extremely long time to mature and reach a level of relative independence.  We need the physical and emotional care of others in order to survive to adulthood, only to eventually decline back into dependence on the physical care of others.  Throughout, our bodies bear the signs of our relational history.  Our belly buttons remind us of our mothers’ nurturing gift of self in her womb.  Our physical features remind us of the gift of life we receive from our parents and ancestors who came before.  All of this led Pope St. John Paul II to exclaim, “This is the body: a witness to creation as a fundamental gift, and therefore a witness to Love as the source from which this same giving springs” (TOB 14:4, italics in original). 

Even more, we discover in our bodies our sexual identity as male or female.  This sexual difference only makes sense when we think of the two in relation to each other.  It shows us that man and woman are made for each other.  Our maleness and femaleness enable us to make a “total” gift of self by which the two “become one flesh” through marital union.  Pope John Paul II coined the term the “spousal meaning of the body” to refer to the human body’s “power to express love: precisely that love in which the human person becomes a gift and — through this gift — fulfills the very meaning of his being and existence” (TOB 15:1, italics in original).   

What the saintly pope is telling us is that since every human person is a gift, the meaning of life is to give ourselves away as a gift to others.  When we live a life of total self-giving, we act in accord with God’s wise and loving plan, the very structure of our being and essence, and the deepest desires of the human heart.  I invite all of us to reflect on how we can embrace this way of life more fully as we continue our journey through Theology of the Body.   

Note:  This article is part of a series of reflections on Pope St. John Paul II’s “Theology of the Body”.

Continue Reading: Gift, Self-gift, and the Meaning of Life — Part 3:  The Spousal Meaning of the Body

Dr. Sodergren’s Introduction to Theology of the Body: A Collection of Articles from the Catholic Telegraph

Written by, Dr. Andrew Sodergren, M.T.S., Psy.D.,
Director of Ruah Woods Psychological Services

(Article originally published in The Catholic Telegraph, June 2022 Issue, the official magazine of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati)

Gift, Self-gift, and the Meaning of Life — Part 3:  The Spousal Meaning of the Body

We saw in previous reflections that all of creation is a gift held in being at every moment by God, whose inner life is an eternal giving and receiving of Love.  Since the very meaning of our existence is gift, and we are made in the image of God who is Love, the fulfillment of our being and existence is to give ourselves away in love (i.e., self-gift).  When we make a “total” gift of self, we give our whole selves — body, soul, past, present, and future — to another.  This most complete form of self-gift is properly called “spousal,” and the proper “place” for this spousal gift is marriage.  The human body, which reveals our maleness or femaleness, shows us that man and woman are made for this kind of spousal gift of self.  The body bears witness to the fact that man and woman are made to belong to each other in an exclusive, permanent way through which may flow the blessing of children. 

Reflecting in this way on the human body and the logic of gift led Pope St. John Paul II to coin the phrase the “spousal meaning of the body.”  This concept was crucial in his thinking about the human person, so much so that he used the term a total of 117 times in Theology of the Body, prompting the editor of the English edition to refer to it as “the single most central and important concept in TOB” (M. Waldstein, TOB, p. 682).  Let’s unpack this concept further.

Referencing one of his favorite passages from the Second Vatican Council, Pope St. John Paul II wrote, “The body has a ‘spousal’ meaning because the human person… is a creature that God willed for his own sake and that, at the same time, cannot fully find himself except through the gift of self” (TOB 15:5).  How do we “find” ourselves by making a gift of self? 

According to the late pope, we discover who we are in how we are received by another, especially in those moments when we are truly “naked,” not necessarily physically but truly vulnerable with another, revealing our inmost self.  In those moments of deep encounter, we “find” ourselves — for better or worse — in  the other’s reception of us.  If we are fully “welcomed” and “accepted” by the other as a gift, we discover the truth of our “giftness.”  We learn, “I am a gift, a person to be loved, respected, treasured.”

In applying these insights to the encounter between our first parents described in Genesis 2, Pope St. John Paul II wrote of how the man and woman beheld in one another “a beauty that goes beyond the simply physical level of ‘sexuality.’”  They looked on each other with a “deep availability for the ‘affirmation of the person.’”  The man and woman saw more than just their sexual features but “through the body someone willed by the Creator ‘for his own sake,’ that is, someone unique and unrepeatable, someone chosen by eternal Love” (TOB 15:4).  Though they were naked, they felt no shame because they perceived that they were completely safe in the person-affirming gaze of the other.  They discovered that each of their bodies revealed a mystery we call “person,” and through their reciprocal self-giving and welcoming of one another, they discovered their true value as gifts to be treasured.  In this way, our first parents discovered the spousal meaning of the body and its essential connection to man’s “original happiness” (TOB 15:5).  

Indeed, we are all called to see in each other’s bodies a person who must be welcomed, accepted, even treasured, as a supreme gift from the Creator.  By receiving one another in this way, we help each other “find” ourselves, discovering the truth of our “giftness.”  We are then emboldened to reveal and welcome each other more and more deeply such that our “mutual gift creates the communion of persons” (TOB 17:3).  Thus, the spousal meaning of the body means that through this giving and welcoming, accepting and finding, our bodies proclaim to us the eternal truth that “happiness is being rooted in Love” (TOB 16:2).

Note:  This article is part of a series of reflections on Pope St. John Paul II’s “Theology of the Body.”

Continue Reading: Knowledge, Procreation, & the Primordial Sacrament

Dr. Sodergren’s Introduction to Theology of the Body: A Collection of Articles from the Catholic Telegraph

Written by, Dr. Andrew Sodergren, M.T.S., Psy.D.,
Director of Ruah Woods Psychological Services

(Article originally published in The Catholic Telegraph, July 2022 Issue, the official magazine of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati)

Knowledge, Procreation, & the Primordial Sacrament

In recent articles, we have reflected on the logic of gift and the spousal meaning of the body.  We saw that our very existence is a gift from God that He lovingly gives us at every moment.  We also saw that the dignity of man, made in God’s image, requires that every human person always be received and treasured as a gift.  When we are welcomed and accepted in this way, we discover our “giftness,” thus “finding” ourselves (i.e., discovering our true dignity). 

We also saw that since the logic of gift permeates the very structure of our being and essence, we find our deepest fulfillment when we cooperate with this logic by making a gift of ourselves to others in love.  This takes place in a special way in the encounter between man and woman.  Through our bodies we discover our equal and profound dignity but also the reality of the sexual difference — our maleness and femaleness.  This unity in human nature and difference of sex creates the capacity for spousal communion, which we fulfill by making a total gift of self to each other.  This total gift of self through spousal love between a man and a woman is the essence of marriage.    

Pope St. John Paul II reflected on the encounter of the first man and woman before the Fall and how they were naked before each other and felt no shame because they beheld more than just their sexual features.  Rather, they saw in one another’s bodies “someone willed by the Creator ‘for his own sake,’ that is, someone unique and unrepeatable, someone chosen by eternal Love” (TOB 15:4).  They beheld a person to be treasured as a gift, not used as a means to an end.  Nonetheless, they were still moved by natural attraction of the sexes as they beheld the mystery of the person revealed through the masculine or feminine body.  This desire, however, was properly ordered and in harmony with the dignity of the person, not tainted with selfishness as in the case of fallen humanity.  In that state, man and woman could come to “know” each other through conjugal relations in a pure, dignified way, infused with holiness and respect for the person. 

According to the late pope, through the encounter by which the man and woman “know” each other, they discover the hidden power of procreation.  While the features of her body point to the possibility of motherhood, the woman’s hidden capacity to conceive new life and nurture it in her womb is only gradually revealed over time.  In this way, husband and wife discover through her body that their mutual “knowledge” in conjugal relations is intrinsically connected with the blessing of fruitfulness.  The presence of the child reveals that their spousal gift of self is naturally oriented toward and finds its crowning in motherhood and fatherhood.  Indeed, it is through receiving her husband’s self-gift and giving herself in return that the woman receives the gift of her motherhood.  Similarly, it is through his wife that the man discovers and receives his fatherhood.  In this way, each “finds” himself anew, now as a father or a mother.  They find themselves too in the face of the child who is the image of their love. 

Pope St. John Paul II saw marriage and family as the climax of creation.  Before sin entered the world, the coming together of man and woman in marriage and subsequent begetting of new life was infused with God’s grace.  Not only could it bestow earthly life to new human beings but also it was the means by which God intended to convey divine life to the entire human family.  Thus, the pope referred to marriage as the “primordial sacrament,” by which he meant that in the beginning, marriage was the efficacious sign of God’s plan to share His own divine life with humanity, drawing all of us into the intimacy of His eternal, divine Communion.  In light of this, let us pray and work to renew a sense of reverence for the sanctity of marriage and the awesome responsibility of cooperating with God to bring new life into the world.

Note:  This article is part of a series of reflections on Pope St. John Paul II’s “Theology of the Body.”

Continue Reading: An Integral Vision of Man

Dr. Sodergren’s Introduction to Theology of the Body: A Collection of Articles from the Catholic Telegraph

Written by, Dr. Andrew Sodergren, M.T.S., Psy.D.,
Director of Ruah Woods Psychological Services

(Article originally published in The Catholic Telegraph, August 2022 Issue, the official magazine of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati)

An Integral Vision of Man

For many months now, we have been exploring Pope St. John Paul II’s reflections on “original man” (i.e., man and woman before the Fall).  We have pondered original solitude, original unity, and original nakedness as well as the logic of gift, the spousal meaning of the body, and marriage as the primordial sacrament.  Before we go on to the next major topic of TOB, it may be useful to revisit the overall purpose and structure of the late pope’s reflections.

Through his pastoral ministry as a priest and bishop, John Paul II was well aware of the questions faced by men and women today:  Who am I?  Where did I come from?  Where am I going?  How can I find fulfillment?  What is love?  He was also well acquainted with the myriad ethical dilemmas facing modern man as our technological mastery of nature — including the human body — has grown exponentially in the last 100 years.  In the 1960s, he was deeply involved in the Church’s deliberations regarding contraception and served as a key theological advisor to Pope St. Paul VI who, in 1968, reiterated the Church’s perennial teaching on the immorality of contraception in his encyclical letter Humanae vitae.  However, Paul VI recognized that in order to receive this teaching fully, modern man needs to see how it corresponds to his nature and his good.  In this regard, Paul VI spoke of the need for “an integral vision of man” and sketched some aspects of such a vision.  However, he left it to his brother priests, bishops, and theologians to develop and expound such a vision to support not only the Church’s teaching against contraception but all of her teachings in the area of sexual ethics, which increasingly are held in suspicion or even scorn.

Desiring to help develop such “an integral vision of man” that could answer the existential questions of contemporary men and women and show them the truth and beauty of Catholic moral teaching, Pope St. John Paul II wrote his TOB reflections.  He used the phrase “theology of the body” as a working title for his reflections because it is impossible to understand what it means to be human without pondering the human body, which is intrinsic to who we are.  Even more, he saw in the Incarnation of Christ how the human body plays a central role in salvation history.  That is why he remarked,

“The fact that theology also includes the body should not astonish or surprise anyone who is conscious of the mystery and reality of the Incarnation.  Through the fact that the Word of God became flesh, the body entered theology… I would say, through the main door” (TOB 23:4, italics in original).

In TOB, Pope St. John Paul II followed the example of Christ who responded to questions from the Sadducees about divorce by appealing to “the beginning” and quoted the opening pages of Genesis.  For this reason, the late pope began TOB by going back to the beginning and pondering “original man” (i.e., man and woman before the Fall).  Up to this point, our explorations have focused on this portion of TOB.  However, the late pope’s reflections did not remain there.  To complete his “integral vision of man,” he again followed the example of Christ and reflected on “historical man” (i.e., fallen and redeemed) and “eschatological man” (i.e., in view of the resurrection and eternal glory).  After this three-fold reflection on man, the late pope provided an extensive reflection on the sacramentality of marriage before finally turning to matters of sexual ethics. 

Having highlighted the teachings on “original man” in these articles, we will next be delving into historical and eschatological man.  This deep dive into TOB will not only help us understand and embrace more fully the Church’s teachings on marriage and sexuality but will also show us how to live fulfilled lives in accord with God’s plan.  This is especially true for those called to marriage, as Pope St. John Paul II pointed out:

“Those who seek the fulfillment of their own human and Christian vocation in marriage are called first of all to make of this ‘theology of the body’… the content of their lives and behavior” (TOB 23:5).

Let us all — married or otherwise — heed the saintly pope’s words and continue to ponder God’s beautiful design for us through the lens of TOB. 

Note:  This article is part of a series of reflections on Pope St. John Paul II’s “Theology of the Body.”

Continue Reading: The Four Harmonies

Dr. Sodergren’s Introduction to Theology of the Body: A Collection of Articles from the Catholic Telegraph

Written by, Dr. Andrew Sodergren, M.T.S., Psy.D.,
Director of Ruah Woods Psychological Services

(Article originally published in The Catholic Telegraph, September 2022 Issue, the official magazine of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati)

The Four Harmonies

Up to this point, our reflections have focused on God’s original plan for humanity as manifest in the state and experiences of our first parents in the beginning.  Their experiences are part of what Pope St. John Paul II referred to as our “theological pre-history” (TOB 4:1-3).  Human history as we know it began with the Fall of man, which we call original sin.  It is only by reflecting upon our experience of what’s wrong the world (including our own humanity) in light of Scripture and Tradition that we can gain insight into the life of our first parents before the Fall.  This is just what Pope St. John Paul II has done in Theology of the Body and what we have been doing in these reflections. 

Before going on to ponder what went wrong in the beginning and how sin continues to exert its destructive influence in human history, I would like to reflect one more time on the state of man in the beginning.  Doing so helps us understand God’s original plan – i.e., how things are supposed to be – as well as the end toward which He is guiding us through salvation history.   

The state of humanity before the Fall, which is inaccessible to us now, has been variously referred to as original justice, original innocence, or original happiness.  Pope St. John Paul II used all these terms more or less synonymously in TOB to describe the condition of our first parents.  Their existence was marked not only by a freedom from sin and its effects but also a fullness of grace and goodness which I describe as the “four harmonies” (see Catechism nos. 374-379).  These four harmonies characterize man’s relationships with God, himself, other human beings, and the rest of creation.  Let’s briefly look at each.   

Before the Fall, man existed in a state of intimacy and communion with God in which he was filled with grace and preternatural gifts.  Our first parents’ relationship with God was marked by complete trust, cooperation, and communion.  They truly walked in the presence of God as His sons and daughters, filled with reverence and filial love, trusting fully in their Father’s word.  This is the first and most important of the four harmonies.  It is the basis upon which man was able to receive all of God’s other gifts and blessings. 

Original man also experienced interior harmony in which all of the powers and facets of his body and soul were perfectly integrated.  There was no interior conflict; no struggle between his head and heart.  This harmony within man conveyed a peacefulness and self-possession that maximized his freedom.  As a perfectly integrated unity of body and soul living in graced friendship with God, original man experienced an absence of illness and decay and would have been spared the separation of body and soul we call death had he not turned from God through sin.   

The third harmony describes the relationship between human beings prior to the Fall.  The first two harmonies enabled our first parents to look on each other “with all the peace of the interior gaze” (TOB 13.1).  As described in our reflections on original nakedness, there was no reason to feel fear or shame in the presence of another human being because original man’s eyes were open to the dignity of the human person revealed through the human body and his heart was properly ordered to always respect, reverence, and love each human person made in God’s image.  Because their eyes and hearts were so pure, there were no inner temptations to use or hurt one another.   

Lastly, original man existed in harmonious relationship with the rest of creation, which he joyfully received and cherished as a gift from the Creator.  The elements and creatures of the natural world yielded to the will of man which was guided by wisdom, stewardship, and gratitude, as he exercised his divinely-appointed authority over the world.   

Considering these four harmonies helps us glimpse God’s wise and loving plan for humanity.  It also prepares us for our subsequent reflections in which we will explore the wounding effects of sin and the healing power of our redemption in Christ. 

Note:  This article is part of a series of reflections on Pope St. John Paul II’s “Theology of the Body.”

Continue Reading: The Tragedy of Sin: Part 1

Dr. Sodergren’s Introduction to Theology of the Body: A Collection of Articles from the Catholic Telegraph

Written by, Dr. Andrew Sodergren, M.T.S., Psy.D.,
Director of Ruah Woods Psychological Services

(Article originally published in The Catholic Telegraph, October 2022 Issue, the official magazine of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati)

The Tragedy of Sin — Part 1

In last month’s reflection, we explored the state of our first parents at the beginning of time, which was marked by what I call the Four Harmonies — between man and God, within man himself, between one another, and with the rest of creation.  When we reflect on our own experiences, we quickly discover that, for each of us, these relationships are not marked by persistent harmony but in fact, significant disharmony.  This difference is the clearest indication that we exist in a different state than our first parents.  The primordial event that separates them from us and radically changed the state of our humanity is what we refer to as original sin. 

We are all familiar with the story in Genesis 3 in which the serpent tempted the woman to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, how she succumbed and induced the man to do likewise, and how their situation before God and before each other was altered for the worse.  We know that, prior to this tragedy, the man and woman did not experience the inclination to sin that we now experience.  They experienced the Four Harmonies and were filled with God’s grace.  How is it that they could fall into sin?  What was the nature of their sin? 

In our experience, temptations to sin come from a variety of sources, which Scripture and Tradition have summarized as the flesh, the world, and the devil.  That is, temptations to sin come from within our fallen human nature, from the negative influence of others, and from demonic influences.  However, our first parents, being filled with grace and possessing a fully integrated human nature, could only experience temptations from external sources.  Scripture identifies the source of their temptation as the “serpent” (Gen 3:1) who is later revealed to be “the great dragon… that ancient serpent, who is called the Devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world” (Rev 12:9) and whom Jesus refers to as “the father of lies” (Jn 8:44).  Satan and his demons, who were created good and “endowed with knowledge and freedom had been ‘put to the test’ so they could make their choice commensurate with their purely spiritual nature” (John Paul II, Sept. 10, 1986).  At the outset of creation, Satan and his demons “radically and irrevocably rejected God and his reign” (CCC 392), preferring themselves to God out of pride.  In their consequent exile from heaven, they seek to subvert God’s reign wherever they can, and so tempted our first parents into sin.

The tempter succeeded in his effort to provoke humanity’s fall from grace by inducing doubt of God’s goodness.  In Genesis 3:4-5, Satan distorts the words of the Creator and sows seeds of suspicion and rebellion in our first parents.  Specifically, he plants the idea that God’s law, rather than being an expression of His wisdom and love, is merely an arbitrary imposition to ensure our subordination.  If we rebel, as the lie goes, we can become “like God,” no longer dependent on our Creator.  Rather, we can become gods ourselves.  It is as if Satan is saying to our first parents — and to all of us — that God is holding you back and you will never be fulfilled unless you take what you want and ignore His presumptively false warnings and apparently arbitrary rules.  Under Satan’s influence, God no longer looks like a loving Father and the bestower of gifts more numerous and immense than we could ever deserve.  Rather, He looks — in this demonic distortion — like an evil tyrant who is uninterested in our fulfillment, seeking only to control us while keeping His greatest blessings for Himself.

The tempter succeeded in undermining our first parents’ trust in their loving Father.  Through their disobedience, they rejected God’s love as well as their status as creatures, seeking rather to supplant the Creator.  As Pope St. John Paul II said, they gave in to “love of self to the point of contempt of God” and in so doing, “became the slave and accomplice of the rebellious spirits” (Sept. 10, 1986).  In subsequent reflections, we will continue to explore the tragedy of sin, especially its impact on the relationship between the sexes, as well as God’s unrelenting pursuit of our redemption. 

Continue Reading: The Tragedy of Sin: Part 2

Note:  This article is part of a series of reflections on Pope St. John Paul II’s “Theology of the Body.”

Dr. Sodergren’s Introduction to Theology of the Body: A Collection of Articles from the Catholic Telegraph

Written by, Dr. Andrew Sodergren, M.T.S., Psy.D.,
Director of Ruah Woods Psychological Services

(Article originally published in The Catholic Telegraph, November 2022 Issue, the official magazine of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati)

The Tragedy of Sin — Part 2

As we began to explore last time, at the beginning of human history, there was a fundamental break from the state of original innocence enjoyed by our first parents, who enjoyed harmony within themselves, in their friendship with God, in relationship with each other, and in relation to the rest of creation.  The “ancient serpent, who is called the Devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world” (Rev 12:9) succeeded in inducing our first parents to sin by sowing seeds of doubt into their minds and hearts.  Let’s dig deeper into the nature of this temptation and see what relevance it has for us today.

Recall that, in creation, God bestowed a special dignity to man by creating us in His image and likeness and establishing man as lord and steward of the visible world.  Even more, God breathed divine life into us, placing us in a special relationship with Him and destining us to someday partake in His glory.  In this context, God commanded out first parents not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.  While this may seem an arbitrary prohibition, Pope St. John Paul II, in his catechesis on sin, highlighted how this command is essentially a reminder to man that we are creatures.  Through this command, God was saying to our first parents and to all of us,

“Remember that you are a creature called to friendship with God, who alone is your Creator. Do not wish to be what you are not! Do not wish to be ‘like God.’ Act in accordance with what you are, and all the more willingly since this is already such an exalted status, that of being ‘the image and likeness of God’… [This] status… obliges you to act in conformity with what you are. So be faithful to the covenant that God the Creator has made with you, a creature, from the beginning” (Nov. 12, 1986).

To be a creature, is to be the recipient of the unmerited gifts of life and existence.  God loves His creation into existence and sustains it in being through the power of His love at every moment.  With our creaturely status comes dignity, love, blessing, and obligations.  All creatures are called to act in accord with the nature they have received and toward the end for which they were created.  Being created as free, rational persons, man is called to freely cooperate with God’s will, using his gifts of freedom and reason to reign over the earth and make it more and more a reflection of God’s infinite love, beauty, wisdom, and goodness.  Even more, man is called to come to know and love God with his whole heart and mind and enter into eternal communion with Him. 

The prohibition from eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, more than an arbitrary rule, is a loving reminder of man’s status and a protection against pride.  Through this prohibition, God was telling our first parents that He alone has the authority to determine what is good and evil.  Man cannot decide these things but must — for his own good — act in accord with the order established by God.    

Satan casts doubt on God’s intentions and plants the idea in man’s mind that we can take good and evil into our own hands.  We can become like God and determine right from wrong.  He entices us to think that God is suppressing us, alienating us from our potential.  In order to be fulfilled, we must reject His laws and embrace autonomy (i.e., become a law unto oneself). Only then can we truly be free and come into our own. 

This dynamic between Satan and our first parents reveals the inner logic of sin, which affects us even today.  How often does modern man seek to reject his Creator and the created order?  How often do we try to re-create ourselves according to the image we conceive rather than receiving our nature and identity from God?  How often do we reject God’s laws and those of His Church as arbitrary impositions that keep us from our happiness rather than seeing them as the royal road to happiness?  How often do we suspect God of oppressing us and having evil intentions toward us rather than trusting fully in His infinite, unchanging, Fatherly love for us?  How often do we take matters into our own hands rather than waiting hopefully upon the Lord?   

In truth, it is not God who robs us of our dignity and blocks our deepest desires.  Rather it is sin that alienates us from God, from ourselves, and from one another.  It is sin that wounds our dignity, our hearts, and our world and robs us of grace, peace, and joy.  By pondering further the tragedy of sin and its effects on us, we can learn to reject the lies of the enemy and receive more fully and gratefully the gift of redemption in Christ.

Note:  This article is part of a series of reflections on Pope St. John Paul II’s “Theology of the Body.”

Continue Reading: The Wounds of Sin

Dr. Sodergren’s Introduction to Theology of the Body: A Collection of Articles from the Catholic Telegraph

Written by, Dr. Andrew Sodergren, M.T.S., Psy.D.,
Director of Ruah Woods Psychological Services

(Article originally published in The Catholic Telegraph, December 2022 Issue, the official magazine of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati)

The Wounds of Sin

In our last two reflections, we have explored the nature of the sin that occurred at the beginning of human history when Satan tempted our first parents to mistrust their Creator and seek to supplant Him.  Being deceived, they grasped at divinity, thinking they could determine right from wrong and become gods themselves.  In so doing, they broke faith with God, rejected their creaturely status, and allowed sin to enter the visible world.  Let us reflect on the effects that this original sin had on our first parents and continues to have on their children.

Prior to the Fall, our first parents existed in a sinless state marked by the four harmonies.  When they accepted Satan’s lies and rebelled against God, those four harmonies were all disrupted.  As the fathers of the Second Vatican Council said, “refusing to acknowledge God as his beginning, man has disrupted also his proper relationship to his own ultimate goal as well as his whole relationship toward himself and others and all created things” (Gaudium et spes, no. 13). 

Most fundamentally, original sin effected a fundamental break in our first parents’ graced friendship with God.  “In that sin man preferred himself to God and by that very act scorned Him” (Catechism, no. 398).  As representatives of the entire human race, our first parents’ act of rebellion resulted in the loss of divine grace and the preternatural gifts not only for themselves but also for their descendants. As John Paul II taught,

“The first human being (man and woman) received sanctifying grace from God not only for himself, but as founder of the human family, for all his descendants.  Therefore, through sin which set man in conflict with God, he forfeited grace (he fell into disgrace) even in regard to the inheritance of his descendants” (Sept. 10, 1986).

The first and most important wound of original sin, then, is our alienation from God.  However, the legacy and effects of our first parents’ sin remains extending to our very essence for we now inherit a human nature that is not only deprived of grace but is itself deeply wounded.  As the Catechism describes, original sin damages the essence of man in the unity of his body and soul.  In our fallen human nature, man’s intellect is darkened, his will is weakened, and his passions become rebellious.  Even the unity of body and soul is wounded such that we are now vulnerable to a myriad of sicknesses and disorders and will ultimately succumb to the separation of body and soul, which we call death.  Due to the uncorrupted quality of human nature and the abundance of God’s grace and gifts prior to sin, man was immune to these maladies and the inevitability of death. Clearly, our situation after the Fall is radically different. 

All of us inherit this fallen (i.e., wounded) human nature.  We experience sickness, decay, and eventual death.  We experience interior conflict rather than harmony and struggle to know what is right, freely choose it, and follow through in action while our impulses and desires pull us to go astray.  St. Paul expressed well our conflicted, fallen existence in his lament: 

“I do not understand my own actions. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate…. I can will what is right, but I cannot do it.  For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I do…. For I delight in the law of God, in my inmost self, but I see in my members another law at war with the law of my mind and making me captive to the law of sin which dwells in my members.  Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death?” (Rom 7:15, 18b, 22-24).

All is not lost.  Our human nature, though wounded, is not wholly corrupt.  It is still essentially good and capable of being redeemed, sanctified, and glorified.  Just as we can join in St. Paul’s lament over our fallenness, we can also join with him when he immediately exclaims, “Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord!” (Rom 7:25). For God did not abandon us to the power of sin and death but pursued man down the centuries, sparing nothing to bring about our Redemption, even taking up our human nature to heal and restore it and through His resurrection, re-open the path to eternal life. 

Note:  This article is part of a series of reflections on Pope St. John Paul II’s “Theology of the Body.”

Continue Reading: Original Shame – Part 1

Dr. Sodergren’s Introduction to Theology of the Body: A Collection of Articles from the Catholic Telegraph

Written by, Dr. Andrew Sodergren, M.T.S., Psy.D.,
Director of Ruah Woods Psychological Services

(Article originally published in The Catholic Telegraph, January 2023 Issue, the official magazine of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati)